You must be registered to comment and vote on comments.
Generally I love your takes but I think you were a bit harsh on this one. I saw this film recenly on a trip to NYC and while it's true that the tone was approving, it was hardly "celebratory to a fault." Frankly I thought the filmmakers made a real attempt to stop short of the kind of worshipful, sycophantic lionization that fellow travelers might have prefered. Instead, Trumbo was presented as a markedly flawed human, sometimes grandiose, egotistical, contankerous and alchoholic (to a fault), and ultimately motivated more by the heart of an insurrectionist and an outsized sense of self-righteous indignation than any overriding political ideology. Frankly that was what I loved about this film. Finally, your point about a lack of historical context seems unfair given the fact that probably 2/3 of the film is consumed by performances making it tough to pack all that background, along with the interviews and film clips, into the remaining 30 minutes, so I felt compelled to cut the filmmakers more slack given the serious storytelling challengs. Besides, there was in fact quite a bit of archival material jammed into the front end (although admittedly, it was thrown at us in stoccato-like fashion), so it's not as though they didn't try.
Your comment is being reviewed for inclusion on the site.
Comments will be reviewed before being published.
425 Portland Av. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55488
© 2013 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
StarTribune.com is powered by Limelight Networks