Global Search

commentaries

South Korea doesn't need nuclear weapons

  • Article by: New York Times Editorial
  • Updated: March 18, 2013 - 6:52 PM

It’s little wonder that South Koreans are thinking about ways to defend themselves, given North Korea’s bizarre and dangerous behavior. The North has recently launched a long-range rocket and conducted its third nuclear test. It has also unleashed a barrage of apocalyptic threats, including potentially launching “pre-emptive nuclear strikes” on Seoul and the United States and declaring the 1953 Korean War armistice nullified.

  • 2

  • Comments

  • Results per page:
  • 1 - 2 of 2
sfcmarkcMar. 19, 13 4:30 PM

Assuming that the US will keep over 28,000 troops there forever isn't a wise move. We are even now withdrawing even more soldiers from Europe.

1
0
jd55604Mar. 19, 13 5:35 PM

South Korea doesn't need U.S. military bases there either. Let them deal with their own security.

0
0
  • 1 - 2 of 2

Comment on this story   |  

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

from the homepage

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT