You must be registered to comment and vote on comments.
Students can afford $X to pay for college, based upon their assessment of the value of the education. The amount of tuition they colleges can then collect is ($X)x(number of students).
The State and the Fed want to help everyone, so they chip in $Y to every student in loans, grants, and assistance. Do colleges now collect $X-$Y from the students? No, why should they? Instead they charge $X+$Y. And everyone is happy. (Well, at least the colleges.) Since that worked well, the colleges now start raising their tuitions to $Z, which is larger than $X+$Y. Fewer students can afford it, but that's OK, because the ones that can the colleges will force to pay the whole $Z, and the others will be subsidized by the "$Y" money that no longer hss to go to students who can afford it.
Should demand for their degrees fall, as students realize that $100K for a degree in Art History isn't going to be cost-justifiable, the government steps in again with more loans and grants, and the colleges again make more money.
STOP GOVERNMENT FUNDING OF POST-HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION. HAVE THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT LOANS, SO IF THE DEGREES ARE ECONOMICALLY JUSTIFIABLE, LOW INCOME STUDENTS CAN ACHIEVE THEIR DEGREES.
Your comment is being reviewed for inclusion on the site.
Comments will be reviewed before being published.
425 Portland Av. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55488
© 2013 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
StarTribune.com is powered by Limelight Networks