You must be registered to comment and vote on comments.
Report makes it clear action is needed on civil commitment.
I would hope that longer minimum prison sentences initially, at least for the more serious offenders, are part of the conversation. They would definitely alleviate any constitutional double-jeopardy concerns.
I am just not seeing it......savings in having more facilities. Cost to build or develop, staff more with even minimal security, treatment staff, admin etc. For many of the offenders, there needs to be a clear path to treatment completion and integration into the community. Why not use existing private treatment vendors and utilize technology and best practices in community supervision? No matter how you slice it, keeping these offenders in any sort of facility is costly.
If this policy of indefinite incarceration for "treatment" ever reaches the U.S. Supreme Court, it will be shot down on a 9-0 vote. We all know this but deny it. In response our state leaders cynically continue the policy because they lack the political courage to craft a constitutional replacement.
Recently a man charged with a sex crime in Hennepin County was arrested for that crime in England.The British refused to extradite him to the United States because of Minnesota's indefinite civil commitment statute.If this statute was not on the books he would have been returned to Minnesota.Minnesota might even face an issue where other states could refuse to extradite offenders to Minnesota.
Just sentence the worst( most likely to re offend) To much longer sentences. The succes rate on rehabilitation is not encouraging. Until we find a better solution these creepy guys must be kept away from vulnerable people, but the current system is obviously going to end either through the courts or the legislature.
One idea, release a couple and watch them 24/7. When they re-offend, as they undoubtedly will, sentence them to a long term.
Lengthy sentences, where truly warranted, must be assigned as part of the court-ordered punishment.
Contrary to fwallen's pessimism, the success rate on rehabilitation is very encouraging. Policies that do as Thunder suggests is the best course, even leaving financial concerns out of the equation, because all available data suggests that the best hedge against re-offense is meaningful access to community and family support, resources, and integration.
Your comment is being reviewed for inclusion on the site.
Comments will be reviewed before being published.
The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.
425 Portland Av. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55488
© 2013 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
StarTribune.com is powered by Limelight Networks