Editorial: Details still sketchy after Petraeus affair

  • Article
  • Updated: November 12, 2012 - 6:14 PM

Timeline, national-security implications deserve a full airing.

  • 4
  • Comments

  • Results per page:
  • 1 - 4 of 4
probsolverNov. 12, 12 6:28 PM

The fact is, he has shown himself to be weak and vulnerable. Traits that disqualify him as a general, head of te CIA, and as a husband. I feel for those he has betrayed.

4
2
stplooklistnNov. 13, 12 4:20 AM

CIA is supposed to be good at covert affairs. He was brought down by a cat fight.

2
1
lizardguyNov. 13, 1211:05 AM

More bad news for the obama regime that was buried until after the election.

1
4
shadowman7Nov. 13, 1212:39 PM

It is not surprised to find out "Brand Petraeus" is just another empty suit who couldn't keep his pants on (i.e., an empty suit without pants), even for national security. As Sherman Alexie said last night, our CIA Director, the person responsible for our most important secrets, is using Gmail to conduct an extramarital affair? Really? To make matters worse, it made sense for this leadership god to try to keep the affair secret and keep his job. The politicians and military establishment used Brand Petraeus to convince us there was something noble about disastrous wars. In the end, Petraeus has been exposed as a hollowed-out soul running around without pants. How quickly he went from All In to All Out.

0
0
  • 1 - 4 of 4

Comment on this story   |  

ADVERTISEMENT

  • about opinion

  • The Opinion section is produced by the Editorial Department to foster discussion about key issues. The Editorial Board represents the institutional voice of the Star Tribune and operates independently of the newsroom.

  • Submit a letter or commentary
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT