Same-sex marriage ban defeated

  • Article by: BAIRD HELGESON , Star Tribune
  • Updated: November 7, 2012 - 1:28 PM
  • 254
  • Comments

  • Results per page:
erikj3Nov. 6, 12 8:01 PM

Millions down the drain, dozens upon dozens of articles and op-eds, all over something that's already illegal. Bottom line: This amendment is going down, the last poll had it at 51% opposing.

224
11
mockingyouNov. 6, 12 8:33 PM

ironically, it will all be settled by the courts anyway. sigh. so much time, energy, and money wasted.

155
10
SqUaReD80Nov. 6, 12 8:47 PM

Glad the churches spent MILLIONS of dollars to support bigotry instead of using it for good. Anyone else see the little kids in that picture holding the signs? Shame on those parents.

285
48
grinnell4Nov. 6, 12 8:50 PM

Those who want this passed will never have a better chance than now. Those who oppose gay marriage are typically older and those who are tolerant of gay marriage are younger. Won't get any easier than this year.

166
12
jaa1169Nov. 6, 12 8:53 PM

I personally voted Yes Yes, becuz i am pizzed at all the lawn signs. Yes yes! Also, i have been forced to cave in to your political views for the last four years, why would i cave into yours now? Just a stick it in them vote...

34
311
jastkeNov. 6, 12 9:06 PM

The Republicans apparently decided to put these amendments on the ballot in part to energize their base to improve turnout in this election. I think the anti-amendment base was energized even more. Seems like a backfired strategy.

242
21
getcrazyNov. 6, 12 9:50 PM

According to the votes that are coming in it looks like this freedom taking amendment is being rightfully defeated. Good! Now lets ask the non-profit that doesn't pay taxes if we should change things so they do pay taxes.

169
17
boognish78Nov. 6, 12 9:51 PM

How would legalization lead to learning about same-sex marriage in schools? And if it was a topic in a class, I'm sure students could opt-out (not unlike opting out of sex-ed in favor of abstinence only curriculum). I believe that marriage is a private institution between two consenting adults. Who those consenting adults are is not too important to me as a person who went through a failed, childless, heterosexual marriage. There are enough marriages out there that are devoid of love and emotional support that proponents of this amendment see as benchmarks to the institution; conversely, there are happy, healthy, stable same-sex couples that are being marginalized in the interests of religious agenda. I just don't know how proponents of this amendment can be so unaware of contradictions inherent in their use of faith as a crutch to support bigotry and hatred.

141
18
upnorth85Nov. 6, 12 9:58 PM

I went for the election just to vote NO to both the amendments. I do not think it is right to carve in stone a discrimination in our constitution. The constitution is a document to protect the rights of everyone living in MN. I am happy to see this going down.

206
16
merkinNov. 6, 1210:31 PM

I'm just back from the polls and in my precinct the opposition to both amendments was overwhelming, to the tune of 2 ½ to 1 and 3 to 1. I'll tune in tomorrow to see how the results look, but right now it's not favorable for either amendment.

118
9

Comment on this story   |  

ADVERTISEMENT

Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT