You must be registered to comment and vote on comments.
Can anyone eplain why Obama thinks green jobs are good and oil jobs are bad? And oil jobs do not need subsidies. Some liberal will reference depletion allowance and other tax breaks. But you have to pay taxes to get a tax break. Green jobs need direct subsidies and pay no taxes. Big difference.
LiberalOne46 - Obama thinks both are good - hence the largest increase in oil leases in the last 8-10 years. What Obama favors and Romney does not, is investment in future technologies that could have a significant impact on fuel usage. "Green" power can be adopted for scales from home to commercial. Those are power sources that have no extractive or transport costs. They are intended to REDUCE usage of the expensive "fossil fuel" systems - which reduces actual power costs for industrial scale power users - and increases their profitability. --- Lastly , if you think big oil isn't actively receiving massive federal subsidies - you missed the last 5 years of media coverage on Energy. Big Oil has has received subsidies every year for the last 5 decades. Do an internet search ... seriously.
Your comment is being reviewed for inclusion on the site.
Comments will be reviewed before being published.
425 Portland Av. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55488
© 2014 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
StarTribune.com is powered by Limelight Networks