Will new stadium translate into victories?

  • Article by: MARK CRAIG , Star Tribune
  • Updated: May 11, 2012 - 12:00 PM

Sparkling new NFL stadiums can provide countless amenities and pad teams' coffers, but recent history shows they cannot guarantee success on the field.

  • 69
  • Comments

  • Results per page:
sharkysharkMay. 10, 1210:34 PM

Wilf's lip service about championships notwithstanding, a good argument can be made that now that the stadium is in the bag (almost), there's no reason to waste more money on real talent. You don't have to take my word for it. Just look at the Twins.

thome2011May. 10, 1210:55 PM

Zigmus you sly dog

vampress_meMay. 10, 1210:57 PM

Yeah! We have a new stadium! Now on to hosting a Super Bowl, oh, wait, the Broncos haven't hosted one in their new stadium...oh well, on to a winning season in the new stadium, umm...look at the Twins, maybe not... What is it the taxpayers are getting out of a new stadium again?

hugelatsMay. 10, 1211:03 PM

Here's a thought, get your businesses under control so that payroll isn't killing your bottom line. Then you won't need a new stadium every other decade.

erikj3May. 10, 1211:22 PM

Watch as Wilf laughs all the way to the bank while the Queens spend the next 30 years as cellar dwellers, just like the Twinks.

bredpathMay. 10, 1211:35 PM

First off, the Wilfs are more than willing to spend money to put a winning team on the field. When everyone thought bringing Favre back in '10 would get the Vikings into the playoffs, they put up the money. And that's just one example. Twins fans should pray that team ever gets owners like that. Second, since the new CBA, teams are REQUIRED to spend about 90% of the salary cap, it's called a salary floor. Third, the Metrodump is severely lacking when it comes to luxury suites (among other things), which is a huge money maker for the Wilfs. Take a wild guess what they added to both Lambeau and Soldier Field during the renovations of those stadiums - luxury suites. Time for some of you guys to suck it up and realize that the Wilfs are actually good owners, the stadium is going to be built, and the Vikings are going to be around for a long time.

oberschutzeMay. 10, 1211:38 PM

Only guarantee of the new stadium is Z Wilf's team is now worth several hundred million dollars more.

sharkysharkMay. 11, 1212:10 AM

bredpath, I will never understand why you guys are so willing to carry water for someone that doesn't know you're alive. You don't understand how you've been played. Of course it's about the money but it isn't really your or my problem to inflate the team's bottom line. The Vikings were always going to stay around. There was no reason to pay them to stay.

bruisedupMay. 11, 1212:44 AM

I really don't know how anyone could be confident that the Vikings were going to stay wether a stadium deal was made or not. If most people in Minnesota were asked 3 weeks ago wether the Vikings were staying or not I would believe most would say that the Vikes would be leaving. I really can't believe how quickly this whole thing turned around.

bruisedupMay. 11, 12 1:19 AM

Great memories for the Metrodome will always be about the Twins in 87 and 91. Since the Twins have gone to their new stadium there hasn't been big spending on free agents but there never was big spending on free agents for the Twins. The Wilfs have been the biggest spenders on free agents that I have ever seen for any Minnesota sports franchise. On that 09 Vikes team a large part of that core was free agent players that got old. My belief is that the Wilfs are really into football. I think they have a genuine love for the game. I see a bright future for the Vikings and the Wilfs with this new stadium coming and if anyone has a problem with that I don't really care. Right now I'm walking on clouds. Read it and weep nay sayers: THE VIKINGS ARE GETTING A NEW STADIUM!


Comment on this story   |  


St. Louis - L. Lynn 12:05 PM
Washington - J. Zimmermann
Toronto - M. Buehrle 12:05 PM
Cleveland - C. Kluber
LA Angels - C. Wilson 12:08 PM
Detroit - M. Scherzer
Baltimore - B. Norris 12:35 PM
Boston - F. Doubront
Minnesota - K. Correia 1:10 PM
Kansas City - B. Chen
Cincinnati - T. Cingrani 1:20 PM
Chicago Cubs - E. Jackson
Houston - B. Oberholtzer 3:05 PM
Oakland - S. Kazmir
Milwaukee - M. Garza 6:05 PM
Pittsburgh - W. Rodriguez
Atlanta - E. Santana 6:10 PM
NY Mets - B. Colon
NY Yankees - I. Nova 6:10 PM
Tampa Bay - C. Archer
Seattle - R. Elias 6:10 PM
Miami - H. Alvarez
Chicago WSox - J. Quintana 7:05 PM
Texas - C. Lewis
Philadelphia - K. Kendrick 7:10 PM
Colorado - J. Lyles
Arizona - M. Bolsinger 7:10 PM
Los Angeles - D. Haren
San Francisco - T. Hudson 7:40 PM
San Diego - E. Stults
Brooklyn 11:30 AM
Golden State 2:30 PM
LA Clippers
Atlanta 6:00 PM
Memphis 8:30 PM
Oklahoma City
Chicago 2:00 PM
St. Louis
Columbus 6:00 PM
Minnesota 8:30 PM
Houston 3:00 PM
New England 3:00 PM
San Jose 5:00 PM
Los Angeles 6:00 PM
Vancouver FC
D.C. 6:30 PM
Toronto FC 7:30 PM
FC Dallas
Montreal 7:30 PM
Sporting Kansas City
Portland 8:30 PM
Real Salt Lake
Seattle 9:30 PM
Chivas USA
Connect with twitterConnect with facebookConnect with Google+Connect with PinterestConnect with PinterestConnect with RssfeedConnect with email newsletters



Date/Opponent Time W L Score
2013 preseason     
Aug 9 - vs. Houston 7 pmX27-13
Aug 16 - at Buffalo 6 pmX20-16
Aug 25 - at San Francisco 7 pmX34-14
Aug 29 - vs. Tennessee 7 pmX24-23
2013 regular season     
Sep 8 - at Detroit NoonX34-24
Sep 15 - at Chicago NoonX31-30
Sep 22 - vs. Cleveland NoonX31-27
Sep 29 - vs. Pittsburgh (in London) NoonX34-27
Oct 6 - Bye
Oct 13 - vs. Carolina NoonX35-10
Oct 21 - at. NY Giants 7:40 pmX23-7
Oct 27 - vs. Green Bay 7:30 pmX44-31
Nov 3 - at Dallas NoonX27-23
Nov 7 - vs. Washington 7:25 pmX34-27
Nov 17 - at Seattle 3:25 pmX41-20
Nov. 24 - at Green Bay Noon26-26
Dec 1 - vs. Chicago NoonX23-20
Dec 8 - at Baltimore NoonX29-26
Dec 15 - vs. Philadelphia NoonX48-30
Dec 22 - at Cincinnati NoonX42-14
Dec 29 - vs. Detroit NoonX14-13




question of the day

Poll: Will you boo Jared Allen when he returns with the Bears?

Weekly Question