You must be registered to comment and vote on comments.
According to the Tea Party if we allocate more funds to vets we will have to make cuts to some other group to pay for it. Ok, so should we take money from the disabled, the elderly or the poor? Of course we would never ask the billionaires to give a little more in taxes.Sorry vets. Thanks for your service! But the Tea Party says no.
Tea Party vs the volunteer soldier! Too funny!
No Revenues = Still No Sacrifice = That's Called That 'Support' For The Troops!!
Now a decade plus, added to the previous decades since Korea, especially ours Vietnam!!
Already known through decades of our brothers and sisters living those false patriotic? meme's and cheap phony symbols of including their 'purple heart bandages'!
Those who brung us the No Sacrifice quickly changed their meme's and even with a new label, now known as TEA Party or in reality 'teahadist' of the first degree!!
Your comment is being reviewed for inclusion on the site.
Comments will be reviewed before being published.
Poll: Should Adrian Peterson play the rest of the season?
425 Portland Av. S.
Minneapolis, MN 55488
© 2013 StarTribune. All rights reserved.
StarTribune.com is powered by Limelight Networks